Download PDFOpen PDF in browser

Inadmissible Evidence: Integrating Irrelevant Information in a Multiple Source Scenario

EasyChair Preprint no. 6158

10 pagesDate: July 27, 2021

Abstract

Jurors’ use of inadmissible evidence illustrates the impact of irrelevant information in multiple-source comprehension. Participants read a trial in one of four conditions: Admissible (evidence included), Due Process (evidence inadmissible because of fairness), Unreliable (evidence inadmissible because of ambiguity), Control (evidence excluded). Afterwards, participants recommended a verdict (guilty or not guilty), rated evidence importance, and wrote an essay. Inadmissible evidence was rated highly and included in essays, indicating that readers integrate and use irrelevant information.

Keyphrases: comprehension, Inadmissible evidence, Integration

BibTeX entry
BibTeX does not have the right entry for preprints. This is a hack for producing the correct reference:
@Booklet{EasyChair:6158,
  author = {Sarah D. Creer and Donovan C. Kelley and Ellen S. Cohn and Laura K. Allen},
  title = {Inadmissible Evidence: Integrating Irrelevant Information in a Multiple Source Scenario},
  howpublished = {EasyChair Preprint no. 6158},

  year = {EasyChair, 2021}}
Download PDFOpen PDF in browser