Reality as Ametaproblem in Transdiscipline

EasyChair Preprint no. 3362

Abstract

The approach of a problem with which every scientific research project begins is a problem that is framed in a community that keeps common ideas and identifies meanings, conventions in a “field of knowledge”. The exception of its value and criteria of truth puts a platform that supports or provides solidity and uses the more generalized term of the construction of the historical conventions, “reality. From here, any projection to be resolved takes on value, truth and justification, which come into conflict if they leave the defined concept of reality; Science as an institution bases its universal criteria as prescriptions of conception of “the reality whose consensus implies its own forms from the approaches as problem solving. In this context, a problem always contains a lack of understanding, inability to control, the need to know; What underlies the questioning approaches, so you start an investigation. Why? What extent? Until where? What cause? How is it possible?; The resolution is to resort to conventionally constructed models, and every model is an update of domains of understanding or collection of knowledge referred to a "field of knowledge", in a "reality" that presupposes that the sensoperceptible experience underlies solid and objective. The convention is in the precepts, if we leave the conviction there is no truth or validity.

Keyphrases: conventions, issue., Perception Levels, Psychic reality, unconscious

@Booklet{EasyChair:3362,
  author = {Joaquín Pegueros Sánchez},
  title = {Reality as Ametaproblem in Transdiscipline},
  howpublished = {EasyChair Preprint no. 3362},

  year = {EasyChair, 2020}}